HTMLradar

HTMLRadar vs Papermark

We borrowed Papermark's playbook. Then aimed it at HTML.

Papermark is the open-source DocSend alternative for PDFs. They got to $900K ARR doing exactly what we're doing — open-source code, hosted SaaS, AGPL license. Honest answer: if you live in PDFs, use them.

But if you live in HTML — investor decks rendered to a browser, AI-generated briefs, founder pitches that work better in a tab than as a download — PDF tools force you back into PDFs to track. HTMLRadar tracks what you already have.

HTMLRadarPapermark
Native formatHTMLPDF / PowerPoint
Section-level dwellYes — heading-based, 3s thresholdPage-level only
Per-recipient linksYesYes
Password + expiry per shareYesYes (free)
Version control (replace, keep links)YesYes
Free-tier doc limit10 lifetime50 documents
Watermark on user contentNo — chrome onlyNo
Custom domainv1.1 paidBusiness tier
Open sourceAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
Pricing (entry paid tier)$15/mo$29/mo

When to use HTMLRadar

When to use Papermark

Both products are AGPL-3.0. Both are bootstrapped. We hope they both do well.

Common questions

How is HTMLRadar different from Papermark?
Both are open-source AGPL-3.0 document trackers. Papermark is PDF-first with data rooms; HTMLRadar is HTML-native with section-level dwell tracking for decks, briefs, and proposals.
Is HTMLRadar open source like Papermark?
Yes — same AGPL-3.0 license. The tracker, proxy worker, schema, and web app are all on GitHub and can be self-hosted.
Which is cheaper?
HTMLRadar's paid tier is $15/mo flat. Papermark's entry paid tier is $29/mo. Both have free tiers, and both can be self-hosted for free.

Related: self-hosted document tracking and how we built HTMLRadar.

← Back home